In a surprising a 5-1 decision, BER rejected the hearing examiner’s recommendation that the BER rule against us, saying essentially that there was “insufficient information” for them to make that determination. (The hearing examiner is a DEQ employee that evaluates evidence about the permit process.)
The decision verifies what PTC has been saying all along - that the permitting process lacked proper notification of nearby property owners, inadequate review of risks to the Clearwater River, and did not include existing information about critical wildlife habitat.
BER Chairperson, David Simpson stated:
“This board has the responsibility to examine whether or not the department followed the law in issuing the permit. That’s our primary function but it’s not limited to that. We also have the responsibility to look at the substance of the decision that’s being made here under our responsibility under the Constitution. And I just can’t understand why we’re in a position of being asked to make a decision when we have virtually no information.”
See the documents section for full transcript of the ruling.